Djokovic v Tsitsipas: Astana Final Analysis
Loose games—Tsitsipas' slice issues—forehand strategies
Novak Djokovic defeated Stefanos Tsitsipas 6/3 6/4 in the final of the Astana ATP500. The Serb extends his win streak to 9 matches and now leads Tsitsipas 8-3 in their H2H.
The opening exchanges featured clear tactics from both:
Tsitsipas looked to pressure the Djokovic forehand with his own hard crosscourt forehands; if he could make it a battle of forehands, he was a good chance.
Djokovic was willing to trade forehands as a means to open up space on the Greek’s backhand. As I have touched on before, Tsitsipas lacks a great defensive slice. He is most vulnerable when running to the backhand.
Tsitsipas
The point below plays across two GIFs, and it’s an excellent example of how Tsitsipas should play more often; commit to forehand exchanges and play with variation on his backhand—using slices to compliment the forehand would reduce the attack options of opponents looking to expose his backhand.
This match was basically decided by two very mediocre service games from Tsitsipas—one in each set—and it has been a symptom of the Greek’s game this season; a string of errors and wayward tactics coalesce in 3 or 4 points.
Serving at 3-4 in the first set Tsitsipas missed two regulation forehands and a poor slice to gift the break to Djokovic. Djokovic also started to look more dominant than Stef in the forehand exchanges, and in a lot of ways, the trends in this match were a carbon copy of their Madrid final. Against Djokovic, Tsitsipas looks lost once his forehand doesn’t pay immediate dividends, and his panic manifests in low-percentage plays (down-the-line drive backhands, drop shots, and serve-volley are the usual symptoms). If he had a better slice I think he would feel he could be more patient and apply this tactic with more margin. But he still doesn’t have that shot, and I see little improvement in it, despite what the commentators said today to pad the air-time. This is the most worrying thing for me; how has he not changed and improved this shot in the last 18-24 months? A quote from a prior piece:
The very best are willing to make deliberate changes to equipment and technique if it means improving. They didn’t get better simply by playing the matches and assuming improvement would happen without deliberate practice. They battled, lost, analysed, and adapted.
At 2-2 in the second the Greek played another loose game and was broken to love:
The first point was the best construction from Tsitsipas, but Djokovic did what Djokovic does:
Stef then missed an off-forehand taking a big cut on a ball he had no business with. Perhaps premeditated as it was off the return.
A serve-volley attempt wide to the Djokovic forehand on the deuce side was met with a shoelace volley that he dumped into the net.
Tsitsipas attempted a drop shot at 15-40 that landed halfway up the net. Game Djokovic.
Djokovic
Djokovic was never really pushed in this match; he didn’t face a break point and was up a break relatively early in both sets. Much like last week’s final against Marin Cilic, this was a masterclass in absorbing the power of his opponent and turning the screws with his unmatched control. From last week:
Corner defense married with controlled depth and subtle change-of-direction may not make for good highlight reels, but it allows him to effortlessly tear apart quality top-20 opposition without getting out of mid-gears.
If you don’t have a strong AD side in the men’s game today, you have built your game on sand; the top players will ruthlessly expose you. As good as Tsitsipas is, his backhand side will forever be the castle of sand until his slice develops into something world-class.
But let’s forget Tsitsipas’ backhand for a moment, because even if he were to magically develop an Evans/Federer slice, he would still have a mountain to climb. Djokovic won this match in fourth gear, with glimpses of his end-range:
Djokovic has now sealed his spot at the World Tour Finals in Turin next month. At 35, Djokovic looks fitter and hungrier than anyone he’s faced in the last fortnight, and despite what the rankings say, he is the best player in the world right now. For Tsitsipas and Medvedev, there are still areas to improve technically (slice and volleys, respectively), and until they do they are entering matches as underdogs against a man who just won’t quit.
A final quote I saw on Twitter attributed to Aldous Huxley:
“Experience is not what happens to a man; it is what a man does with what happens to him.”
Hi Hugh, I've been reading your blog posts for a while and implemented some of the concepts to a tournament I played in yesterday. More specifically hitting slices a la Dan Evans and chipping hard first serves to neutralize points. I've also tried to "drop" my racket head more on my backhand side but that didn't actualize in my matches as much as I would have liked (I still need to work on it!). All of this to say, I just won the first tournament I've played in over 3 years at the 4.5 level and I think it is partly attributed to these concepts. So, thank you! :)